Skip to main content

Simulation run on this device. Scenario values are not sent anywhere — the engine is fully local.

agents studio · pro

PDF-to-RAG Readiness Scan

Score a PDF's layout for extraction risk before it poisons the index.

Is this document chunkable — or a table soup?

Engine 1.0.0 · studio
Regions detected
5
Extraction risk
7/10
Recommended chunking
layout-aware + table serialization
Multi-column text
7/10
Wide tables
8/10
Figures & captions
6/10
Footnotes
5/10
Equations
7/10
  • high
    Multi-column text

    use a layout-aware parser; naive extraction interleaves columns

  • high
    Wide tables

    detect + serialize tables to markdown; never chunk mid-table

  • medium
    Figures & captions

    keep caption attached to its figure chunk; OCR only if text is in the image

  • medium
    Footnotes

    link footnotes to their reference, do not emit as standalone chunks

  • high
    Equations

    extract LaTeX where possible; a lost symbol flips the meaning

Parse for the riskiest region first — it determines whether the rest of the pipeline is trustworthy.

Method

  • Scores extraction risk per described layout region (columns, tables, figures, footnotes, equations, running headers) and recommends a chunking strategy.
  • Risky regions are parsed first — they decide whether the rest of the pipeline can be trusted.